By Dennis J. Whittlesey
While he is in the process of negotiating a new gaming compact with the Seminole Tribe, Florida Governor Rick Scott has jumped into the contentious debate on whether Internet gaming should be legal. In this, the Governor has lined up with casino mogul Sheldon Adelson in outright opposition to a component of the gaming industry that has wide support and already is being legalized within several states.
The emergence of the Governor in this debate comes at a time when he is working to develop expanded gaming for the Seminoles, as well as preside over a major review and potential overhaul of his state’s gaming industry by the State Legislature. That the Governor does not envision state adoption of iGaming is clearly evidenced by his April 22 letter to the Chairmen and Ranking Members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees on Capitol Hill urging legislation that would reverse a Department of Justice ruling that the Federal Wire Act does not prohibit intrastate Internet gaming. This ruling reversed official federal policy on the subject, and several states are now allowing Internet gaming within their borders.
Governor Scott’s letter warned that iGaming will allow the “invasion” of gaming into “the homes of every American family, and be piped into our dens, our living rooms, our workplaces, and even our kids’ bedrooms and dorm rooms,” and called for Congressional “clarification” of the Wire Act to prohibit all iGaming within the United States. Copies of the letter were sent to the Senate and House leadership of both political parties.
While there is other public opposition to Internet gaming, development of this segment of the industry continues. Internet gaming is available throughout Europe and has been authorized in New Jersey, Delaware, and Nevada. Authorizing legislation is currently being considered in a number of other states. In a recent assessment, GamblingCompliance.com estimates that 10 states may legalize online wagering this year.
It is not surprising that the Indian gaming industry wants to pursue iGaming given its successful development of land-based casinos. To this point, the growth of tribal gaming has far surpassed anything envisioned when the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act became law in 1988. At this time, recognized tribes operate 450 casinos in 28 states, and they generate in excess of $28 billion annually. The scope of Indian gaming compares favorably to commercial gaming, which generates some $34 billion. Forty-four states have state lotteries, and they generate revenues of more than $17 billion. Rightly or wrongly, tribes feel that they already have the casino management experience and available funds to pursue and operate iGaming.
In short, many tribes are actively exploring online options, although it appears that the most sophisticated effort is being made by the politically powerful California tribal gaming industry. Although there have been setbacks in this effort due to the early departure of several powerful members of the state legislature, the matter is being actively debated in Sacramento, and pressure is building to enact legislation before the 2014 session is over. Effectively, this means by the end of August.
At least two California tribes – Santa Ysabel and Alturas – are indicating that they are prepared to begin online gaming immediately rather than await legislation. Both are proposing gaming websites that would take wagers from off-reservation players, claiming that they already have the legal authority to do so. Alturas has entered into a partnership with Great Luck, LLC and seems poised to commence operations and contest any legal challenges that arise. The only obstacle remaining to the Alturas project is a lack of a firm to process wagers. Another element that tribes are discussing would sidestep the question of whether off-reservation players could play by using on-reservation “proxy” players.
While the states are moving forward, there is activity on the federal level in the form of a bill that would ban interstate iGaming. Known as the “Restoration of America’s Wire Act,” the legislation has generated gaming industry efforts to block it. However, the powerful billionaire gaming mogul Sheldon Adelson is strongly supporting the bill and has persuaded a number of prominent members of Congress to join his cause. This legislation does present a serious threat to iGaming and should be of concern to the iGaming industry and the states that have enacted intrastate iGaming laws or will do so this year. Governor Scott’s April 22 letter should serve as something of a clarion call to all entities and parties with a stake in iGaming.
The growing interest in, and state legislation allowing, intrastate iGaming is gaining momentum, and tribes are now actively seeking to participate. While the iGaming “train” has left the station in several states, the fact remains that the iGaming industry needs to be ever vigilant to efforts such as the “Restoration of America’s Wire Act” bill or the train could be slowed or stopped.
Gaming and Hospitality Practice
- Home
- Sample Page
- #metoo
- 2007 Bank Secrecy Act
- AB40
- AB75
- ABA Gaming Minefield Conference
- Alabama-Coushatta Tribe
- Alaska Natives
- Alberta Gaming and Liquor Commission
- Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario
- Alexander Valley Association
- American Gaming Association
- Aquinnah
- Arizona
- Arizona Department of Gaming
- Associated Equipment Manufacturers
- Athens Acquisition LLC
- Auditor General of Ontario
- Background Checks
- Bay Mills
- Big Fish
- Big Lagoon Rancheria
- Bill 4
- Bill 74
- Bill C-290
- Bitcoin
- Brenda Roubidoux Taylor
- British Columbia
- British Columbia Gaming Control Act
- Bulgaria
- Bureau of Indian Affairs
- California
- California Consumer Privacy Act
- Canada
- Canada Revenue Agency
- canadian gaming law
- Canadian Gaming Summit
- Carcieri Decision
- Caribbean islands
- Casino City Indian Gaming Industry Report
- Casinos
- Catawba Indian Nation of South Carolina
- CCA 202042015
- Chantal Cipriano
- Cherokee Nation
- Class II Gaming
- CLE-rated conference
- Coeur d'Alene Tribe
- Collective Bargaining
- Columbus
- Communique
- compliance
- Connecticut
- Constitutional Amendments
- coronavirus
- covid 19
- Daily Fantasy Sports
- Daniel Bergin
- data
- data portability
- Delaware
- Delaware Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma
- Dennis Whittlesey
- Department of Justice
- Department of the Interior
- dfs
- Dickinson Wright
- Digital Currency
- Dispute Resolution
- DraftKings
- Dry Creek Pomo
- Duwamish
- DW Gaming & Hospitality Blog
- e-sports events
- e-sports wagering
- e-wagering
- Enterprise Rancheria
- eSports
- eSports wagering
- esports wagering legal risks
- European Economic Area
- Ex Parte Young Doctrine
- exempted states
- Fallsview Casino
- Fan Duel
- federal framework
- Federal Jurisdiction
- Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria Tribe
- FinCEN
- Fiscal Cliff
- Florida
- Forest County Potawatomi Tribe
- Foxwoods Casino
- Gambling Act
- Gambling Tax
- Gaming
- Gaming Control Act
- Gaming Cooperation Agreement
- gaming devices
- gaming enterprise districts
- gaming industry
- Gaming Law
- gaming law and regulation
- gaming licensees
- GDPR
- General Data Protection Regulation
- Glendale
- Glendale Project
- Global Gaming Business
- Governor Beshear
- Governor Rick Scott
- Governor Walker
- Grand Canyon
- Graton Resort & Casino
- Greektown Casino
- Greg Gemignani
- Gross Gaming Revenue
- GTA Gaming Bundles
- Hospitality
- Hospitality Law
- Hosting Fee Payments
- House of Commons
- Hualapai Tribe
- Hybrid Games
- I-Gaming
- I-Poker
- ICE Conference
- Idaho
- iGaming
- Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
- IMGL Autumn Conference 2017
- In-N-Out
- Indian Gaming
- Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
- Indian Reorganization Act of 1934
- Indian Tribes
- Instant Racing Gaming Machines
- Interactive Gaming
- International Conference of Gambling & Risk Taking
- International Masters of Gaming Law
- Internet Gaming
- Internet-related gaming legislation
- Interstate Compacts
- Investments
- IRS
- Jack Tadman
- Jeffrey Silver
- Jennifer Gaynor
- Jo Ann Davidson
- Kate Lowenhar-Fisher
- Kenneth Ching
- Kentucky
- Kevin Weber
- Las Vegas
- Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority
- Las Vegas Sun
- legal status
- Legalization of sports betting
- legalized gambling
- Legislative
- Licensing
- Liquor License Act
- Litigation
- Live Entertainment Tax
- London
- Macao Gaming Summit
- Macau
- Madera County Superior Court
- Magazine
- Mashantucket Pequot Tribe
- Mashpee Wampanoag
- Massachusetts
- Massachusetts Indian Land Claim Settlement Act of 1987
- Medical Marijuana
- Menominee Indian Tribe
- Michael Lipton
- Michigan
- Michigan casinos
- Michigan Gaming Control Board
- Mid-America Gaming Congress
- Mississippi Gaming Commission
- Mobile Gaming
- Modernization Plan
- Modernizing gambling statutes
- money laundering
- Morongo Indian Reservation
- National Council of Legislators from Gaming States
- National Indian Gaming Association
- National Indian Gaming Commission
- National Labor Relations Act
- National Labor Relations Board
- NCLGS
- Nevada
- Nevada Business’s Legal Elite 2017
- Nevada Gaming COmmission
- Nevada Gaming Commission Regulation 5.011
- Nevada Gaming Law
- Nevada Legislature
- Nevada oddsmakers
- Nevada Senate Bill 38
- Nevada State Gaming Control Board
- Nevada Tax Commission
- New Jersey
- New Jersey sports betting
- New Mexico
- New York
- NFL Raiders moving to Las Vegas
- Nightclubs
- Nooksack Tribe
- North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians
- Northwest Gaming Law Summit
- Off-Reservation Gaming
- Office of Federal Acknowledgment
- Ohio
- Olympics
- Online Gaming
- Online Gaming Law
- Ontario
- Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation
- Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne
- Pala Band of Mission Indians
- pari-mutuel wagers
- Parliament
- PASPA
- Patrick Sullivan
- Personal Property Taxes
- Peter Kulick
- Phoenix
- Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians
- Privacy Law
- Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act
- Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA)
- Professional Sports Wagering
- Progressive Jackpots
- Promotions
- Pueblo of Pojoaque
- Quebec
- recreational marijuana
- regulation on daily fantasy sports
- Regulations
- Restoration of America's Wire Act
- Revenues
- River Rock Casino
- Robert W. Stocker II
- Ryan Shannon
- Sara Jodka
- Sault Ste Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians
- SB22
- SB240
- SB266
- SB38
- SB40
- SB409
- SB443
- SB445
- SB9
- Second Circuit Court of Appeals
- Secretary of the Interior
- Sen. John Barrasso
- Senate Bill 240
- Senate Bill 409
- Senate Bill 9
- Seneca Nation
- Single Game Sports Betting
- Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
- Slot Machines
- Social Media
- Sonic
- Sovereign Immunity
- Sports Account Wagering
- Sports Betting
- sports betting case
- sports gambling
- Sports wagering
- state authorized marijuana sales
- State Compacts
- Stuart Scott
- Summer Meeting
- Sweepstakes
- Taxation
- taylor anello
- Tennessee
- Tennessee Legislature
- Texas Band of Kickapoo Indians
- Texas State Legislature
- Texas Tigua Tribe
- The International Masters of Gaming Law
- Thomas McNeill
- Timothy Wilmott
- Tohono O'odham Nation
- Toronto
- Tourism
- Trends
- Tribal Contracts
- Tribal Court
- Tribal Membership
- Tribal Payday Lenders
- U.S. Congress
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- U.S. Supreme Court
- U.S. TAX REFORM
- UIGEA
- Uncategorized
- United States Virgin Islands
- Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act
- UNLV
- US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- US Supreme Court
- Velchev & Co.
- Video Games
- Virtual Currencies
- Wall Street Journal
- Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head
- Western Sky Financial
- Wisconsin
- Working Group on Online Gambling
- Wyandotte Nation of Oklahoma
Select Page