By Dennis J. Whittlesey
The landmark ballot referendum proposing to reverse the California Legislature’s ratification of two off-reservation tribal casinos is being challenged in state court litigation seeking to block the referendum from appearing on the general election ballot in November.
The North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians has just filed the litigation in Madera County Superior Court proposing to preserve the compact signed by Governor Jerry Brown in July 2013 and approved through operation of federal law on October 22, 2013. Formal notice of the compact approval was published in the Federal Register on that same day. The status of the second compact likely will be determined in this litigation although that tribe is not a party to this litigation.
The Legislature approved the two compacts pursuant to California’s state law requiring legislative ratification of such documents. California is one of the states requiring legislative confirmation of tribal compacts. California’s Constitution allows statutes enacted by the Legislature to be challenged through petition and referendum, and the required number of signatures to put the measure on the ballot was collected within the requisite period of time. The petition drive was conducted by a Sacramento area casino watchdog organization and was funded primarily by two casino tribes and a New York City investment firm that has a significant investment in one of the tribal casinos opposing the project. The latest estimate of the total amount spent in the petition/referendum effort is $2 million.
The new litigation challenges the referendum on two major legal theories. The first theory alleges that the compact is final because federal law allows tribes to conduct casino gaming so long as the state does not – as a matter of criminal law and public policy – prohibit such gaming activity. However, the gaming must be conducted in accordance with the provisions of a compact negotiated by the Governor and approved by the Secretary of the Interior. Thus, the state court will have to address whether a post-ratification challenge at the ballot box can be used to deratify a compact that has been approved by the federal government pursuant to applicable federal laws. The second theory raises the question of whether legislative ratification of a contract between the State and a tribe is subject to the petition/referendum process.
The stakes in this litigation are enormous for California and its booming Indian gaming industry, as well as neighboring states that permit casino gaming operations. This is litigation that likely will be in higher courts before it is fully resolved.
Gaming and Hospitality Practice
- Home
- Sample Page
- #metoo
- 2007 Bank Secrecy Act
- AB40
- AB75
- ABA Gaming Minefield Conference
- Alabama-Coushatta Tribe
- Alaska Natives
- Alberta Gaming and Liquor Commission
- Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario
- Alexander Valley Association
- American Gaming Association
- Aquinnah
- Arizona
- Arizona Department of Gaming
- Associated Equipment Manufacturers
- Athens Acquisition LLC
- Auditor General of Ontario
- Background Checks
- Bay Mills
- Big Fish
- Big Lagoon Rancheria
- Bill 4
- Bill 74
- Bill C-290
- Bitcoin
- Brenda Roubidoux Taylor
- British Columbia
- British Columbia Gaming Control Act
- Bulgaria
- Bureau of Indian Affairs
- California
- California Consumer Privacy Act
- Canada
- Canada Revenue Agency
- canadian gaming law
- Canadian Gaming Summit
- Carcieri Decision
- Caribbean islands
- Casino City Indian Gaming Industry Report
- Casinos
- Catawba Indian Nation of South Carolina
- CCA 202042015
- Chantal Cipriano
- Cherokee Nation
- Class II Gaming
- CLE-rated conference
- Coeur d'Alene Tribe
- Collective Bargaining
- Columbus
- Communique
- compliance
- Connecticut
- Constitutional Amendments
- coronavirus
- covid 19
- Daily Fantasy Sports
- Daniel Bergin
- data
- data portability
- Delaware
- Delaware Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma
- Dennis Whittlesey
- Department of Justice
- Department of the Interior
- dfs
- Dickinson Wright
- Digital Currency
- Dispute Resolution
- DraftKings
- Dry Creek Pomo
- Duwamish
- DW Gaming & Hospitality Blog
- e-sports events
- e-sports wagering
- e-wagering
- Enterprise Rancheria
- eSports
- eSports wagering
- esports wagering legal risks
- European Economic Area
- Ex Parte Young Doctrine
- exempted states
- Fallsview Casino
- Fan Duel
- federal framework
- Federal Jurisdiction
- Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria Tribe
- FinCEN
- Fiscal Cliff
- Florida
- Forest County Potawatomi Tribe
- Foxwoods Casino
- Gambling Act
- Gambling Tax
- Gaming
- Gaming Control Act
- Gaming Cooperation Agreement
- gaming devices
- gaming enterprise districts
- gaming industry
- Gaming Law
- gaming law and regulation
- gaming licensees
- GDPR
- General Data Protection Regulation
- Glendale
- Glendale Project
- Global Gaming Business
- Governor Beshear
- Governor Rick Scott
- Governor Walker
- Grand Canyon
- Graton Resort & Casino
- Greektown Casino
- Greg Gemignani
- Gross Gaming Revenue
- GTA Gaming Bundles
- Hospitality
- Hospitality Law
- Hosting Fee Payments
- House of Commons
- Hualapai Tribe
- Hybrid Games
- I-Gaming
- I-Poker
- ICE Conference
- Idaho
- iGaming
- Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel
- IMGL Autumn Conference 2017
- In-N-Out
- Indian Gaming
- Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
- Indian Reorganization Act of 1934
- Indian Tribes
- Instant Racing Gaming Machines
- Interactive Gaming
- International Conference of Gambling & Risk Taking
- International Masters of Gaming Law
- Internet Gaming
- Internet-related gaming legislation
- Interstate Compacts
- Investments
- IRS
- Jack Tadman
- Jeffrey Silver
- Jennifer Gaynor
- Jo Ann Davidson
- Kate Lowenhar-Fisher
- Kenneth Ching
- Kentucky
- Kevin Weber
- Las Vegas
- Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority
- Las Vegas Sun
- legal status
- Legalization of sports betting
- legalized gambling
- Legislative
- Licensing
- Liquor License Act
- Litigation
- Live Entertainment Tax
- London
- Macao Gaming Summit
- Macau
- Madera County Superior Court
- Magazine
- Mashantucket Pequot Tribe
- Mashpee Wampanoag
- Massachusetts
- Massachusetts Indian Land Claim Settlement Act of 1987
- Medical Marijuana
- Menominee Indian Tribe
- Michael Lipton
- Michigan
- Michigan casinos
- Michigan Gaming Control Board
- Mid-America Gaming Congress
- Mississippi Gaming Commission
- Mobile Gaming
- Modernization Plan
- Modernizing gambling statutes
- money laundering
- Morongo Indian Reservation
- National Council of Legislators from Gaming States
- National Indian Gaming Association
- National Indian Gaming Commission
- National Labor Relations Act
- National Labor Relations Board
- NCLGS
- Nevada
- Nevada Business’s Legal Elite 2017
- Nevada Gaming COmmission
- Nevada Gaming Commission Regulation 5.011
- Nevada Gaming Law
- Nevada Legislature
- Nevada oddsmakers
- Nevada Senate Bill 38
- Nevada State Gaming Control Board
- Nevada Tax Commission
- New Jersey
- New Jersey sports betting
- New Mexico
- New York
- NFL Raiders moving to Las Vegas
- Nightclubs
- Nooksack Tribe
- North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians
- Northwest Gaming Law Summit
- Off-Reservation Gaming
- Office of Federal Acknowledgment
- Ohio
- Olympics
- Online Gaming
- Online Gaming Law
- Ontario
- Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation
- Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne
- Pala Band of Mission Indians
- pari-mutuel wagers
- Parliament
- PASPA
- Patrick Sullivan
- Personal Property Taxes
- Peter Kulick
- Phoenix
- Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians
- Privacy Law
- Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act
- Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA)
- Professional Sports Wagering
- Progressive Jackpots
- Promotions
- Pueblo of Pojoaque
- Quebec
- recreational marijuana
- regulation on daily fantasy sports
- Regulations
- Restoration of America's Wire Act
- Revenues
- River Rock Casino
- Robert W. Stocker II
- Ryan Shannon
- Sara Jodka
- Sault Ste Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians
- SB22
- SB240
- SB266
- SB38
- SB40
- SB409
- SB443
- SB445
- SB9
- Second Circuit Court of Appeals
- Secretary of the Interior
- Sen. John Barrasso
- Senate Bill 240
- Senate Bill 409
- Senate Bill 9
- Seneca Nation
- Single Game Sports Betting
- Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
- Slot Machines
- Social Media
- Sonic
- Sovereign Immunity
- Sports Account Wagering
- Sports Betting
- sports betting case
- sports gambling
- Sports wagering
- state authorized marijuana sales
- State Compacts
- Stuart Scott
- Summer Meeting
- Sweepstakes
- Taxation
- taylor anello
- Tennessee
- Tennessee Legislature
- Texas Band of Kickapoo Indians
- Texas State Legislature
- Texas Tigua Tribe
- The International Masters of Gaming Law
- Thomas McNeill
- Timothy Wilmott
- Tohono O'odham Nation
- Toronto
- Tourism
- Trends
- Tribal Contracts
- Tribal Court
- Tribal Membership
- Tribal Payday Lenders
- U.S. Congress
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- U.S. Supreme Court
- U.S. TAX REFORM
- UIGEA
- Uncategorized
- United States Virgin Islands
- Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act
- UNLV
- US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- US Supreme Court
- Velchev & Co.
- Video Games
- Virtual Currencies
- Wall Street Journal
- Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head
- Western Sky Financial
- Wisconsin
- Working Group on Online Gambling
- Wyandotte Nation of Oklahoma
Select Page